Investigation 6/27/2026

Session 1: Initial Investigation and Communication Attempts
We formally introduces ourselves to any spirits present, emphasizing peaceful intentions (“light and love”) and curiosity about the building. We invite interaction using available devices, explaining these tools are needed because we cannot normally see or hear spirits. We propose simple, verifiable requests, such as pulling a book halfway out of a shelf if a favorite title exists. Early sounds (knocks, ticks, squeaks) prompt careful evaluation; multiple notes that structural settling, birds, or nearby human activity may mimic paranormal noises. A standout moment occurs when a significant book— “Ghost Soldiers: The Forgotten Epic Story of World War Two’s Most Dramatic Mission” (by Hampton Sides)—is found sticking out in the large print section after knocks are heard. We read the title, thank any involved spirit(s), and treat the find as a potential directed clue. We debunk suspected footsteps by having Atticus run outside along the alley; the replicated sound suggests the original heard footsteps likely came from outside. We synchronize recorders and cameras and conduct EVP playbacks, acknowledging intermittent whisper-like captures. We also invited knocking as a less device-dependent method of communication, setting a protocol of one knock for “yes” and two for “no. ”

Session 2

Focused Communication with Data Loggers

Transitioning to environmental sensors and data loggers, we set a color- coded protocol: blue equals “yes, ” red equals “no, ” with yellow/pressure and temperature variances noted separately. Early exchanges indicate the responding entity is not alone and has not personally seen the ghost cat (though that does not preclude the cat’s presence). The spirit suggests familiarity with the team from prior sessions and self-identifies as “Friends of the Library. ” Atticus’ energy is directly discussed; positive acknowledgments, and the device seems to respond when Atticus leaves and returns, prompting playful dialogue about whether his presence aﬀects engagement. Throughout, we remain aware of natural confounds: structural noise, hall echoes, external voices, and timing coincidences. We hypothesize that spirits may “recharge” between responses and discuss how pressure, hot spots (red), and cold spots (blue) manifest on devices. We revisit timeline theories and non-linear communication: the possibility of bleed-through from other times or dream-states is raised as a thoughtful, cautious speculation, not a conclusion. Overall, the section contains targeted yes/no questioning (e.g., about the cat, identity, roles like volunteer or board member), with occasional confirmation that the responding presence knows of “Friends of the Library, ” yet does not necessarily know specific staﬀ like Joanne.

Session 3

Digital and Audio-Based Spirit Communication

We employ the “puck” device, which converts typed questions into an energy frequency, purportedly allowing spirits to answer through energy. Responses arrive as single words or short phrases, yielding a fragmented narrative: an entity gives the name “Nerve, ” and “Alister” surfaces as an “angry, ” “alone, ” “jerk. ” The device also returns “fired” and “July, ” suggesting that Alister may have been fired in July (year unspecified). A “Roger” mention is considered likely “Robert, ” aligning with a janitor who left in January of the previous year; “Debbie” appears as someone “looking for Alister. ” “Jack” is identified as a long-serving janitor honored with a bench upstairs, though immediate confirmations of Jack’s presence are limited. Shifting to the Wonder Box—a refined spirit box that removes static and uses generated vocal tones—we explain our “test” methodology for audio clarity and spirit voice tracking. We request a repeated “test” response, and note direct name recognition of “Tim. ” The Wonder Box yields conversational exchanges, including comments like “Fine, ” “Let’s talk, ” “How is this thing?” and spatial hints (“in the back, ” “aisles”). At one point, “Atticus” is clearly heard, and calls to “get up” prompt a short dance that elicits laughter and pleased reactions; we probe whether the entity can see the dance, juxtaposing perception across devices.

Session 4:

SLS Camera Interaction and Concluding the Night

In the final phase, the SLS camera maps a figure on the stage area. Upon request, the figure appears to wave. We approach and reach out; the mapped figure responds by “reaching” and “reacting to touch, ” and one participant reports their palm feeling “really cold. ” The figure’s movements are described as cat-like, especially in how it leans and “kicks” its feet while being petted, consistent with prior ghost cat anecdotes. We narrate careful positioning and camera behavior (including occasional freezes and inverted mapping) while preserving operator caution on the stage. As the night winds down, we reflect on device behavior (K2 spikes, data logger flashes), the practicalities of recording (battery swaps, sync calls), and rational evaluation of environmental noises (e.g., a refrigerator sound that twice resembled a cat meow, prompting plans to verify with a voice recorder in that room next time). With time having advanced quickly, we close the investigation and begin packing up equipment, reconciling placement, and discussing follow-ups.

Unfortunately we had several corrupted files on our video cameras and also the SLS camera - this leaves us without video representation of finding the Ghost Soldiers book and also the SLS interaction.

All video is on Youtube and evidence clips are also on all our social media:

@waylandparanormal